All Online Essays
Browse By:
The Obama Administration’s Decisions to Enforce, but Not Defend, DOMA § 3
Delahunty, Robert J.
|
October 10, 2011
The Obama Administration’s Decisions to Enforce, but Not Defend, DOMA § 3
Delahunty, Robert J.
|
March 10, 2015
The Obama Administration’s Decisions to Enforce, but Not Defend, DOMA § 3
Delahunty, Robert J.
|
October 10, 2011
How Goliath Won: The Future Implications of Dukes v. Wal-Mart
Malveaux, Suzette M.
|
September 3, 2011
How Goliath Won: The Future Implications of Dukes v. Wal-Mart
Malveaux, Suzette M.
|
September 3, 2011
Do Violent Video Games Harm Children? Comparing the Scientific Amicus Curiae “Experts” in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
Sacks, Deana Pollard,Bushman, Brad J.,Anderson, Craig A.
|
May 27, 2011
Do Violent Video Games Harm Children? Comparing the Scientific Amicus Curiae “Experts” in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
Sacks, Deana Pollard
|
March 10, 2015
Do Violent Video Games Harm Children? Comparing the Scientific Amicus Curiae “Experts” in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
Sacks, Deana Pollard, Bushman, Brad J., Anderson, Craig A.
|
May 27, 2011
State Law Holocaust-Era Art Claims and Federal Executive Power
Kreder, Jennifer Anglim
|
May 24, 2011
State Law Holocaust-Era Art Claims and Federal Executive Power
Kreder, Jennifer Anglim
|
March 7, 2015
State Law Holocaust-Era Art Claims and Federal Executive Power
Kreder, Jennifer Anglim
|
May 24, 2011
The Tea Party Movement and Popular Constitutionalism
Somin, Ilya
|
April 19, 2011
The rise of the Tea Party movement followed a period during which many academic students of constitutional law focused on “popular constitutionalism”: the involvement of public opinion and popular movements in influencing constitutional interpretation. Many of these scholars argue that popular constitutional movements have a beneficial impact on constitutional law, and some even contend that popular constitutionalism should supplant judicial review entirely. At the very least, the last generation of constitutional scholarship has established that public opinion influences and significantly constrains judicial interpretation of the Constitution.